Writing Here:

duckrabbit
David White
Ciara
John Macpherson
Peter
Sara Trula
Carl Pendle
Joni Karanka
Mike Lusmore
Julian Lass

What they say about duckrabbit:

'One of the hazards of publishing a well-known photojournalism blog - getting multimedia like yours, where the photos are both powerful and moving, and I end up in tears at my desk.'

Alan Taylor, Boston Big Picture)

'David White's multimedia work with duckrabbit is very exciting.'

Kate Edwards (Guardian Magazine Picture Editor)

'I am a fan of duckrabbit. I am not a fan because I agree with everything Ben has to say, but because he says it without frills and then will spend the time necessary to engage the consequent discussions. Such commitment is a priceless commodity.'

Prison Photography

'I met one of them at an academic conference in the summer. He was the sanest person there, but sure enough by damn gadnabbit ruffled more than a few fluffed up peacock feathers.'

The Photography Pages

'If you haven't seen the duckrabbit blog on multimedia you should.'

Stephen Alvarez

'duckrabbit has done another jaw-dropping job with Condition Critical, a highly commendable and important project for Medecins Sans Frontiers.'

The Travel Photographer

Getty loves Flickr, natch.

“It is generally thought the average rate for an image is between $150-$240 (£100-£160).”

By who?

Absolute b$ll£cks.

More like £20 on a good day.

And what’s the creator’s percentage? 10-1 it’s less than Getty’s.

OOOhhh…what a surprise…:

“Photographers receive 30% of each rights-managed sale and 20% for royalty-free stills.”

And the queue will be around the block.

Spread the word
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. Getty and slowly boiled frogs.
  2. AFP, CNN, Getty, ABC, V Morel, why this case matters to all professional photographers or why Getty could be selling your photos without you even knowing …
  3. Flickr v Photoshelter

1 comment to Getty loves Flickr, natch.

  • That article was a joke … the figures were rubbish and the journalist only had to ask Getty to find out. It reads like publicity for the company. Dissapointed to see that on the BBC website.