Writing Here:

duckrabbit
David White
Ciara
John Macpherson
Peter
Sara Trula
Carl Pendle
Joni Karanka
Mike Lusmore
Julian Lass

What they say about duckrabbit:

'One of the hazards of publishing a well-known photojournalism blog - getting multimedia like yours, where the photos are both powerful and moving, and I end up in tears at my desk.'

Alan Taylor, Boston Big Picture)

'David White's multimedia work with duckrabbit is very exciting.'

Kate Edwards (Guardian Magazine Picture Editor)

'I am a fan of duckrabbit. I am not a fan because I agree with everything Ben has to say, but because he says it without frills and then will spend the time necessary to engage the consequent discussions. Such commitment is a priceless commodity.'

Prison Photography

'I met one of them at an academic conference in the summer. He was the sanest person there, but sure enough by damn gadnabbit ruffled more than a few fluffed up peacock feathers.'

The Photography Pages

'If you haven't seen the duckrabbit blog on multimedia you should.'

Stephen Alvarez

'duckrabbit has done another jaw-dropping job with Condition Critical, a highly commendable and important project for Medecins Sans Frontiers.'

The Travel Photographer

World Press Photo entry guest editor..it's TANK!

I thought I’d get down to some editing for the World Press Photo Awards (why does that have caps?) last night, and it all got a mit bessy. First off, I sat down at the computer, as you would, being a modern snapper and all. However, as I had 350 pics to look at, things soon got tricky. I’ve never liked editing a large set on a computer – I’d much rather shuffle a set of prints. As luck would have it I had a set of work prints that I had already edited on a computer…about 30 or so prints. I spread those prints out on the floor, and all was well.

Every one of those 30 prints was important to the story, down from an initial edit of 350; yet I had to lose another 18 to enter a story category in the WPP awards. That was not easy. I was interested to see on the WPP site that the judges will look at a story entry as one entity initially..ie all pics at once. The set must flow well and clearly as a story. Only after that do the judges look at the images individually. Another note on their site was to remind photographers to forget personal feelings for the images, what you had to do to get them etc…that is a very important tip and one that is not easy to follow even after years of experience in editing.

Anyway..back to the prints. I thought I’d made my vicious edit, and was content. Then I asked the wife. Interestingly she chose 9 of the 12 that I did. We then went back and forward for an age and couldn’t decide on the final edit. As luck would have it, just then the cat came in from playing in the snow. He proceeded to walk across all the prints, muddying loads, lay down across them all, sat up and licked his arse.

It’s a good job you don’t enter prints to the WPP awards anymore, I wouldn’t have been a happy bunny. After deciding not to get annoyed with the cat (what’s the point at getting annoyed at a cat?) I picked up my prints. Twelve of them had huge, muddy Maine Coon footprints on, 18 did not.

Tank had chosen my edit. I’m going with it. What could possibly go wrong?

Spread the word
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. World Press Photo not allowing multimedia – error.
  2. World Press Photo Masterclass in racial stereotyping?
  3. World Press Photo award winners now all online

4 comments to World Press Photo entry guest editor..it’s TANK!