Writing Here:

duckrabbit
David White, photographer
Ciara Leeming
Adam Westbrook
Carl Pendle
Joseph Rodriguez
Martin-Nachtwey

What they say about duckrabbit:

'One of the hazards of publishing a well-known photojournalism blog - getting multimedia like yours, where the photos are both powerful and moving, and I end up in tears at my desk.'

Alan Taylor, Boston Big Picture)

'David White's multimedia work with duckrabbit is very exciting.'

Kate Edwards (Guardian Magazine Picture Editor)

'I am a fan of duckrabbit. I am not a fan because I agree with everything Ben has to say, but because he says it without frills and then will spend the time necessary to engage the consequent discussions. Such commitment is a priceless commodity.'

Prison Photography

'I met one of them at an academic conference in the summer. He was the sanest person there, but sure enough by damn gadnabbit ruffled more than a few fluffed up peacock feathers.'

The Photography Pages

'If you haven't seen the duckrabbit blog on multimedia you should.'

Stephen Alvarez

'duckrabbit has done another jaw-dropping job with Condition Critical, a highly commendable and important project for Medecins Sans Frontiers.'

The Travel Photographer

Fancy a drink Dave?...Damn you smell FINE says handy bendy Mandy..

stop section 43 orphan works

The above is the sort of nonsense that will happen if the wretched orphan works bill goes through parliament. Why can’t the brain dead morons who run our country not see that they’re way off the mark on this one.

From the stop43 website:
You’ll have heard of the Digital Economy Bill: it introduces powers to cut your Internet connection if you’re caught illegally downloading films, music or software. It does more than that. It takes your photographs from you, too.

Until now, if someone found one of your photographs and wanted to use it commercially, they couldn’t without first asking you. Clause 43 changes all that by allowing the use of “Orphan Works” – photographs, illustrations and other artworks whose owners cannot be found.

Clause 43 says that if someone finds your photograph, wants to use it and decides that they can’t trace you, they can do whatever they like with it after paying an arbitrary fee to a UK Government-appointed “licensing body”. You’ll never know unless you happen to find it being used in this way, in which case you should be able to claim some money.

There’s more. Clause 43 also introduces “Extended Collective Licensing”.

This means that if someone finds your photograph and can trace you, they still don’t have to contact you for permission to use it. They can go to a UK Government-appointed “collecting society” and ask them instead. They’ll pay an arbitrary fee and be able to do whatever they like with the photograph. Your photograph. Again, without asking you first or paying what you would have charged.

At, least, so we think – because the Bill leaves much of this undefined, unclear and to be dealt with by secondary legislation based on “consultation” that the Government can ignore. Can you imagine what this would mean if we were talking about cars rather than photographs?

THIS MUST BE STOPPED NOW. PLEASE WRITE TO AND VISIT YOUR MP.

The movement to counter Clause 43 has gathered great strength recently and has forced the UK Government finally to take notice of us, having roundly ignored us during the last five years of “enquiries” and “consultations”. They have been forced into making public assurances and committing to limits and further consultations as a result of our pressure. CLAUSE 43 CAN BE STOPPED IF WE MAINTAIN OUR PRESSURE. Thank you.

Spread the word
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. Clause 43 is OUT !!!!!
  2. An oldie, but -damn- …a goodie.
  3. “If you can smell the street by looking at the photo,

2 comments to Fancy a drink Dave?…Damn you smell FINE says handy bendy Mandy..