The Congo as a news story has burned itself out pretty quick. Few news organizations are interested in posting someone permanently there.  Journalists fly in, smash and grab, and fly out again leaving local stringers fighting to get their stories heard.
I don’t think you can blame the news orgs for that. Even the BBC, who have covered the Congo extensively, work on a limited budget.¬†¬† News orgs are also driven by their audiences and Africa is often perceived as one homogeneous place where murder mayhem and corruption are the norm, which makes it a great place to earn your journalistic stripes but sadly of limited interest to the rest of the world.
Reuters is currently hosting a powerful audio slideshow about the Congo featuring the work of Finbarr O‚ÄôReilly. It offers an interesting contrast to MediaStorm’s brilliant production about the Congo for MSF.
There’s an overbearing integrity to Finbarr’s piece. I think its a really important piece of journalism in which in contrast to MediaStorm the production values take a back seat.
Increasingly people are celebrating production technique over content as we constantly struggle to ‘make it new’, to re-invent the medium.
Fine but make sure you don’t go too far up your own arse cause it’s the people, it’s the people’s whose precious stories your’re telling that count. The rest is glamour.
Thanks to the great photojournalism links for spotting this:
Related posts:















Didn’t finish playing for me but I saw enough to realise the week I’ve just had at work wasn’t as bad I as I thought…
You know what Mike, maybe it was, maybe it wasn’t … everything, I mean everything in life is relative. Something I learned whilst living in Ethiopia.
Didn’t finishing playing for me neither. Shame, it’s a very good document. some of the pictures are beautiful, some unbearably shocking
Thanks for bringing the above to light. Yes, bottom line it’s all about the people, but in this case, one so particularly overlooked, forgotten and outright ignored, perhaps a few bells & whistles (and then some) certainly wouldn’t hurt…
hey there’s nowt wrong we ‘glamour’, just that we should see it for what it is … and if it spreads the message then thats no bad thing!
Hopefully- a bit of good news:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/24/world/africa/24congo.html?_r=1&hp